BRIEF HISTORY OF OPERATING SYSTEMS THROUGH TIMEby Cameron KaiserContrary to popular belief. God did not create the operating systemin six days. If He had it would have been much exceed than theones we have now. Nonetheless we got 'em so we'd better learn 'em. While some operating systems like the love-hate Unix have beenaround since the early days of digital computing (read 1960's),most have appeared in the late 70's to the present measure varyingfrom powerful multiuser OS's to little OS's that ran on 8 bitcomputers in under 64K of memory. This is just the briefest portionof operating systems from then until now. To establish a inform of compose all computers must undergo an OS. The OS controls input and output; makes reasonable (questionable insome) effort to hold back peripherals; and in bunco acts as theinterface between you the user the software and the hardware. Early on. OSes were individualized. Since computers were a rarity,the question of standardization was ignored since there were sofew computers to be standardized and consequently the OSes weretied to the capabilities and purposes of each system. Not until theage of microcomputers somewhere come the late 70's do we begin tosee any coherent copy in the chaos. This is where our storybegins with:8-BIT OPERATING SYSTEMSThe first primary microcomputers on the block were the CommodorePET the Tandy and the Apple II. (There IS in fact an Apple I butonly 200 of them were ever manufactured. One of them hangs inApple's offices with the label "Our fail".) Perhaps it would bea good idea to be at how these respective companies fared in theOS world. Tandy is one of the great could-have-beens in the computerworld. Their electronics chain. Radio Shack is known worldwide. Their appliance clones and lines make huge profits. Yet Tandy nevermanaged to crack the microcomputer world to any great degree becausetheir machines were so badly underpowered. Tandy's first foray wasthe TRS-80 in its various incarnations. The TRS when firstintroduced was a hot seller because of (at that time) its powerfuloperating system and the increasing be of software applicationsfor it. Where the TRS-80 fell flat was failing to keep express of theart: many new computers introduced enhanced video or easier to useoperating systems; the TRS kept its 80-column b&w (and damn hard toCorrection: The original TRS-80 copy I had a 64x16 screen though the Model II apparently did have the 80 column one. Thanks to Ricardo Banffy for the correction. Also. I should have been a little more circumspect when I said "underpowered" -- certainly when the TRS-80s first emerged when their major competition was the Commodore PET and Apple I/II they were most certainly not. Tandy's biggest problem was that they actively discouraged any third-party give for their machines with little room for expandability and no assistance for developers. Commodore itself wasn't much better. People started gravitating towards the more hacker-friendly Apple computers about this time. Commodore realised its identify but Tandy tellingly did not. In fact while many authorities ordain cite the early spreadsheet VisiCalc as the killer application for the Apple II it was originally developed on the TRS-80. Presumably Tandy's developer-unfriendly stance made the developers start porting it and it was on the Apple II that it started to take direct (later CP/M and MS-DOS). Thanks to Alex Censor. Neat Fact: Peter Norton's famous utilities collection which is now sold by Symantec was originally written for the TRS-80. Only later was it ported to DOS. (Alex bespeak.)read) screen and its cryptic TRS-DOS which rapidly gained themoniker Trash-DOS. Tandy's next act was the CoCo lie goingthrough the CoCo 1 to the CoCo 3. The CoCo 3 actually was a fairlygood computer with 128K reasonable graphics and appear completedownward compatibility with others in its line and fair supportwith Tandy. However the CoCo was rapidly eclipsed by its primarycompetition the Commodore 64 (which we'll see later) and whenTandy dropped it the CoCo faded away. Tandy now spends its timemaking underpowered PC clones. modify: Tandy no longer makes PCs having now entered a licensing agreement with IBM to sell their Aptiva line. That seems to have folded too though because now I see Compaqs in my local shop. The Tandy PCs had somewhat of a different problem than the TRS-80s; by trying to top IBM's systems in features they only succeeded in making them incompatible. (Thanks to Alex criminalise.)The venerable CoCos are now officially unsupported as near as I can cause. Color Computers were powered by the many variants of the famous Motorola 6809 and the 6847 video divide (except the CoCo 3 which used the ACVC(?) and the 68B09E) and ranged in memory sizes up to 128KB. The Dragon series of computers made by Belgian concern Dragon Data were at least partially compatible with the CoCos -- BASIC programs could run but for legal reasons memory mappings were different and so most of the games which used ML didn't. Apparently the CoCos could be networked together. I myself used to assist a teacher who used a CoCo 3 as a fileserver and through cassette interfaces distributed programs to CoCo 2 clients in the classroom -- pretty neat even in 1988. Many CoCos today run OS-9 -- see Multi-Platform operating systems. Tandy also rebadged computers for sale through their stores (and for that matter still rebadge just about everything else including Casio keyboards and various audio components). Most noteworthy was the Model 100 a rebadged Kyocera machine with a small LCD screen built-in BASIC a built-in word processor and a built-in term program for the internal 300 baud modem. The later 102 and 200 models followed. NEC also had similar machines notably the 8201A and 8300 which were largely BASIC compatible but had different memory layouts. I might also mention the Tandy Pocket Computers; these heterogeneous devices were rebadged Casio and Sharp devices and resemble oversized calculators but in fact were complete computers could save and load from attach and some could even print to tiny plotters and dot-matrix printers. My PC-4 weighs in at a flyweight 1.5K even with RAM expansion but the beefy PC-2 could accomodate much more RAM and had a very complete BASIC. The Apple II series until officially discontinued was oneof the bigger success stories in the 8-bit market. Used all over inAmerican school systems and frequent in American households theApple II going from the plain-vanilla version to the popular AppleIIe/c was a staple in its class. The Apple has several OS's: IntegerBASIC which was a throwback to the old 48K Apple II; DOS 3.3,which was the most common of the DOSes used on the Apple; and thesophisticated but irksome ProDOS which was Apple's measure shot. Apple had the strength of a huge number of users and its massivesoftware library which encompassed cheesy games to powerfulapplications like AppleWorks but the weaknesses of poor graphics,dumb peripherals (meaning they did not manage themselves but hadto be on the host computer a very poor arrangement) no soundabove beeps at various frequencies and above all a nasty priceA raft of add-on boards (like the Mockingboard for sound) could correct these deficiencies but there wasn't much software for them tag. Apple made an attempt at recapturing the merchandise with thebeautiful but impractical Apple IIgs which had some takers in theschool systems but with the advent of the Macintosh Apple phasedout.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://hotel-tech.blogspot.com/2007/10/8-bit-operating-systems.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
